The Dynamism Index by State
-35 – -27
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-5 – -4
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
50 – 53
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
15 – 17.5
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
40 – 44
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
1 – 1.5
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
10 – 11.6
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
0 – 10
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
| Dynamism Indicators for Iowa |
19921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014
|
2014 |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Business Churn | 15.4% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.9% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 63.2% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 29.2% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.2% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.8% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | 1.0 | -0.3 |
| Score | 49.4 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 37 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.9% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.2% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 65.2% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 23.0% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.8% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.0% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | 0.5 | -0.3 |
| Score | 42.9 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 44 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.7% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.4% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 65.9% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 23.6% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.1% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.2% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.7 | -0.3 |
| Score | 45.1 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 43 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.8% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.5% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.3% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 21.2% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.9% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.1% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | 0.1 | -0.3 |
| Score | 43.5 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 45 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.5% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.0% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 22.8% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.4% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.0% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.9 | -0.3 |
| Score | 43.4 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 46 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.5% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.4% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 68.0% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 28.0% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.7% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.5% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -2.0 | -0.3 |
| Score | 45.2 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 44 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.5% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.6% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 68.5% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 22.2% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.1% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.2% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.7 | -0.3 |
| Score | 41.8 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 47 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.0% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.4% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.2% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.8% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.2% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.1 | -0.3 |
| Score | 40.2 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 46 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.7% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.2% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.2% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 22.8% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.2% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.4% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -2.6 | -0.3 |
| Score | 37.9 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 47 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.2% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.0% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 71.3% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 23.8% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.0% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.8% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -4.2 | -0.3 |
| Score | 35.7 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 49 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.1% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.4% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 73.1% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 27.6% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.9% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.1% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -3.6 | -0.3 |
| Score | 39.5 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 47 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.1% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.2% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 74.7% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.0% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.3% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.2% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.9 | -0.3 |
| Score | 36.1 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 46 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.2% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.0% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 74.8% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 23.2% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 70.8% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.5% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.1 | -0.3 |
| Score | 35.2 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 47 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.5% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.2% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 75.0% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 21.0% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.6% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.8% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.1 | -0.3 |
| Score | 36.0 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 49 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.4% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.2% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 74.9% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 21.2% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.3% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -1.0% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | 0.0 | -0.3 |
| Score | 36.4 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 45 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 13.9% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.0% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 75.5% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.6% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.0% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.5% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.0 | -0.3 |
| Score | 36.5 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 45 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.1% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.9% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 76.1% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 21.8% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.4% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.8% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | 0.1 | -0.3 |
| Score | 33.3 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 44 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 13.0% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.6% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 76.8% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 21.8% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.3% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -1.9% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.7 | -0.3 |
| Score | 28.7 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 39 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 11.6% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 76.8% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 20.4% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.2% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.9% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.6 | -0.3 |
| Score | 25.6 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 47 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 12.1% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 77.0% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 19.2% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 70.0% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -1.2% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.5 | -0.3 |
| Score | 24.8 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 44 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 11.5% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.4% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 78.3% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 20.4% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 69.0% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.0% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.2 | -0.3 |
| Score | 24.8 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 46 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 11.5% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.3% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 79.8% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 18.6% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 69.5% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.6% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | 0.2 | -0.3 |
| Score | 21.7 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 50 | 46 |
| 1. Business Churn | 11.6% | 11.6% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.6% | 1.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 79.9% | 79.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 18.0% | 18.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 70.1% | 70.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.4% | -0.4% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.3 | -0.3 |
| Score | 23.1 | 23.1 |
| Ranking | 46 | 46 |
Indicators (Click on each indicator to move to a particular graph) |
Dynamism Index
- United States
- Iowa
Business Churn
- United States
- Iowa
Jobs in New Companies
- United States
- Iowa
Jobs in Incumbent Companies
- United States
- Iowa
Labor Market Churn
- United States
- Iowa
Labor Force Participation
- United States
- Iowa
Change in Firms
- United States
- Iowa
Net Migration
- United States
- Iowa