The Dynamism Index by State
-35 – -27
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-5 – -4
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
50 – 53
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
15 – 17.5
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
40 – 44
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
1 – 1.5
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
10 – 11.6
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
0 – 10
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
| Dynamism Indicators for Florida |
19921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014
|
2014 |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Business Churn | 24.5% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.3% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 52.6% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 38.6% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.3% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 7.6 | 7.1 |
| Score | 77.1 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 1 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 24.1% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.4% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 54.0% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 33.8% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.1% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 3.4% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 7.7 | 7.1 |
| Score | 74.6 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 1 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 24.0% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.3% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 54.4% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 31.4% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.5% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 10.3 | 7.1 |
| Score | 71.9 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 6 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 23.4% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.0% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 54.8% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 31.4% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.2% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 7.2 | 7.1 |
| Score | 68.8 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 6 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 23.1% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.8% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 55.7% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 33.6% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 61.9% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.8% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 8.2 | 7.1 |
| Score | 68.5 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 6 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 23.2% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.1% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 56.7% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 36.6% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.3% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.2% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 8.9 | 7.1 |
| Score | 70.6 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 6 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 23.1% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.8% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 56.9% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 32.2% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.4% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.7% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 7.7 | 7.1 |
| Score | 65.9 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 6 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.7% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.4% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 57.3% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 34.4% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.3% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.8% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 5.8 | 7.1 |
| Score | 65.1 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 5 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.0% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.2% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 57.3% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 32.6% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.9% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.1% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 7.6 | 7.1 |
| Score | 61.9 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 6 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 21.4% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.1% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 60.0% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 34.0% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.2% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 9.4 | 7.1 |
| Score | 62.5 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 5 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.0% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.4% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 61.0% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 38.8% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.4% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.1% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 10.8 | 7.1 |
| Score | 67.0 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 4 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.6% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.9% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 61.6% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 33.6% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.0% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 3.2% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Score | 67.5 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 3 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 24.1% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.9% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 61.1% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 35.0% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.3% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 5.0% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 14.7 | 7.1 |
| Score | 73.4 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 1 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 23.4% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.8% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.2% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 31.4% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.8% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 4.8% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 15.1 | 7.1 |
| Score | 69.5 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 2 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 23.4% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.0% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.7% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 26.8% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.5% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 3.1% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 9.3 | 7.1 |
| Score | 65.3 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 5 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.8% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.6% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 63.6% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 35.6% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.9% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.4% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 1.9 | 7.1 |
| Score | 64.6 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 4 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 23.6% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 66.2% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 31.0% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.7% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -2.6% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.5 | 7.1 |
| Score | 55.8 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 4 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.6% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.8% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.5% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.4% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.3% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -4.8% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.7 | 7.1 |
| Score | 46.5 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 5 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.4% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.2% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.5% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 30.4% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 61.6% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.8% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.0 | 7.1 |
| Score | 51.2 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 2 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.4% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.0% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 68.2% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 28.6% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 61.0% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.4% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 5.7 | 7.1 |
| Score | 50.6 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 2 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 18.8% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.9% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.0% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 27.0% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 60.7% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.9% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 5.3 | 7.1 |
| Score | 48.6 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 2 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 18.5% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.6% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.2% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.8% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 60.2% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.3% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 4.7 | 7.1 |
| Score | 44.7 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 4 | 3 |
| 1. Business Churn | 18.8% | 18.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.6% | 2.6% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 70.0% | 70.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.2% | 25.2% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 60.1% | 60.1% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | 7.1 | 7.1 |
| Score | 45.0 | 45.0 |
| Ranking | 3 | 3 |
Indicators (Click on each indicator to move to a particular graph) |
Dynamism Index
- United States
- Florida
Business Churn
- United States
- Florida
Jobs in New Companies
- United States
- Florida
Jobs in Incumbent Companies
- United States
- Florida
Labor Market Churn
- United States
- Florida
Labor Force Participation
- United States
- Florida
Change in Firms
- United States
- Florida
Net Migration
- United States
- Florida