The Dynamism Index by State
-35 – -27
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-5 – -4
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
50 – 53
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
15 – 17.5
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
40 – 44
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
1 – 1.5
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
10 – 11.6
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
0 – 10
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
| Dynamism Indicators for South Dakota |
19921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014
|
2014 |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Business Churn | 16.5% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.0% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 56.0% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 26.6% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 69.8% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.0% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 3.0 | 0.7 |
| Score | 52.8 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 27 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.9% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.1% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 56.8% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.2% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 70.3% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.3% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 4.1 | 0.7 |
| Score | 52.3 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 23 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 17.0% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.6% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 58.3% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.4% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.5% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.4% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 3.6 | 0.7 |
| Score | 56.4 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 19 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.1% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.9% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 59.9% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 20.4% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.0% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.8% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.0 | 0.7 |
| Score | 48.7 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 34 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 17.1% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.3% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 61.2% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.2% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.7% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.6% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | -2.1 | 0.7 |
| Score | 52.7 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 25 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 17.1% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.2% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 61.4% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 27.6% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.7% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.6% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.9 | 0.7 |
| Score | 52.0 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 26 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 17.5% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.2% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.0% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 23.4% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.4% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.5% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.3 | 0.7 |
| Score | 50.4 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 30 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.6% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.9% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.4% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.4% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.0% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.4% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | -2.4 | 0.7 |
| Score | 49.3 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 24 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.7% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.1% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 63.5% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.6% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.8% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.2% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | -2.3 | 0.7 |
| Score | 48.2 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 21 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.2% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.9% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.6% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 26.2% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.9% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.8% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | -2.2 | 0.7 |
| Score | 47.9 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 21 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.9% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.8% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.6% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 32.0% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.1% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.5% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | -2.1 | 0.7 |
| Score | 51.1 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 19 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.0% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.7% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.5% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 27.8% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.4% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.4% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 0.0 | 0.7 |
| Score | 45.9 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 24 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.1% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 68.2% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 23.6% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.4% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.7% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 1.9 | 0.7 |
| Score | 44.1 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 24 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.1% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.6% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 68.1% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 22.6% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.0% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.8% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 1.1 | 0.7 |
| Score | 44.0 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 25 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.6% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.9% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.5% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 21.2% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.8% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.1% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.5 | 0.7 |
| Score | 44.8 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 26 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.1% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.5% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 26.0% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.2% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.5% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.4 | 0.7 |
| Score | 45.1 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 23 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.7% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.6% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.2% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 21.6% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.0% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.2% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.8 | 0.7 |
| Score | 40.7 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 25 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.1% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.2% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 70.4% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 23.4% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.2% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -1.3% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.0 | 0.7 |
| Score | 37.1 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 14 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 12.1% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 70.9% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 22.6% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.3% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.1% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.2 | 0.7 |
| Score | 34.5 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 18 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 12.5% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.0% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 71.9% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 23.2% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 70.6% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -1.1% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.4 | 0.7 |
| Score | 32.1 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 22 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 12.6% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 72.1% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 20.2% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 70.0% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.7% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 5.1 | 0.7 |
| Score | 34.0 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 20 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 12.3% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.6% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 72.7% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 22.0% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 69.4% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.5% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 5.7 | 0.7 |
| Score | 31.2 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 22 | 23 |
| 1. Business Churn | 12.7% | 12.7% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 73.1% | 73.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 19.4% | 19.4% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 69.3% | 69.3% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.2% | -0.2% |
| 7. Net Migration | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Score | 31.2 | 31.2 |
| Ranking | 23 | 23 |
Indicators (Click on each indicator to move to a particular graph) |
Dynamism Index
- United States
- South Dakota
Business Churn
- United States
- South Dakota
Jobs in New Companies
- United States
- South Dakota
Jobs in Incumbent Companies
- United States
- South Dakota
Labor Market Churn
- United States
- South Dakota
Labor Force Participation
- United States
- South Dakota
Change in Firms
- United States
- South Dakota
Net Migration
- United States
- South Dakota