The Dynamism Index by State
-35 – -27
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-5 – -4
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
50 – 53
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
15 – 17.5
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
40 – 44
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
1 – 1.5
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
10 – 11.6
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
0 – 10
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
| Dynamism Indicators for New Mexico |
19921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014
|
2014 |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Business Churn | 19.1% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.8% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 52.9% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 35.6% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.7% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.4% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 7.9 | -6.8 |
| Score | 64.3 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 14 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 18.8% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.7% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 54.3% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 30.4% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.6% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 3.5% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 8.4 | -6.8 |
| Score | 62.1 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 12 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.3% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.0% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 54.9% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 29.6% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.8% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.9% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 11.4 | -6.8 |
| Score | 64.8 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 12 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.4% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.1% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 54.9% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 27.8% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.7% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.3% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 6.1 | -6.8 |
| Score | 62.8 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 12 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 19.8% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.9% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 56.6% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 30.2% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.4% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.2% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.8 | -6.8 |
| Score | 61.0 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 14 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.1% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.7% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 56.8% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 34.4% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.3% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.6% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.9 | -6.8 |
| Score | 60.7 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 15 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 19.5% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.4% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 57.5% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 31.8% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.4% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.5% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -4.7 | -6.8 |
| Score | 59.7 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 14 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 18.9% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.3% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 59.4% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 31.4% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.8% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.3% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -7.2 | -6.8 |
| Score | 52.5 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 18 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 18.4% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.1% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 59.9% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 31.8% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.0% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.8% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -6.5 | -6.8 |
| Score | 50.8 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 16 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 17.7% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.4% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 60.3% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 33.8% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.4% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.6% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.7 | -6.8 |
| Score | 53.0 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 13 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 17.4% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.6% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 60.9% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 35.6% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.7% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.0% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.7 | -6.8 |
| Score | 56.0 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 13 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.6% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.2% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.9% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 27.0% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.9% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.1% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.7 | -6.8 |
| Score | 47.7 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 16 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 17.0% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.2% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 63.5% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 28.0% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.8% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.5% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 3.2 | -6.8 |
| Score | 49.3 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 15 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 17.1% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.0% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 64.3% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 28.0% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.9% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.8% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.7 | -6.8 |
| Score | 48.8 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 18 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 18.1% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.2% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 63.4% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.0% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.5% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.5% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 4.5 | -6.8 |
| Score | 49.6 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 15 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.9% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.3% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.6% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 30.6% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.0% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.6% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 4.3 | -6.8 |
| Score | 54.2 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 11 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 17.0% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.5% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 64.2% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 28.0% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.0% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.1% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 0.5 | -6.8 |
| Score | 44.1 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 15 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.6% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.2% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 65.3% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 23.8% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.0% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -3.5% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 1.7 | -6.8 |
| Score | 35.7 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 19 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.8% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.0% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 66.8% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 23.6% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 60.0% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -2.5% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 0.9 | -6.8 |
| Score | 30.8 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 28 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.8% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.7% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.0% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 58.8% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -1.4% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 0.0 | -6.8 |
| Score | 31.6 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 25 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.4% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.9% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 26.4% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 58.4% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.5% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -3.6 | -6.8 |
| Score | 33.9 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 21 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.3% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.3% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.8% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 57.8% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.2% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.0 | -6.8 |
| Score | 31.4 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 21 | 29 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.3% | 14.3% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 70.1% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.0% | 24.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 57.5% | 57.5% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.8% | -0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -6.8 | -6.8 |
| Score | 28.3 | 28.3 |
| Ranking | 29 | 29 |
Indicators (Click on each indicator to move to a particular graph) |
Dynamism Index
- United States
- New Mexico
Business Churn
- United States
- New Mexico
Jobs in New Companies
- United States
- New Mexico
Jobs in Incumbent Companies
- United States
- New Mexico
Labor Market Churn
- United States
- New Mexico
Labor Force Participation
- United States
- New Mexico
Change in Firms
- United States
- New Mexico
Net Migration
- United States
- New Mexico