The Dynamism Index by State
-35 – -27
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-5 – -4
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
50 – 53
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
15 – 17.5
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
40 – 44
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
1 – 1.5
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
10 – 11.6
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
0 – 10
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
| Dynamism Indicators for Nebraska |
19921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014
|
2014 |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Business Churn | 15.8% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.7% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 60.6% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 26.6% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.3% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.3% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 0.4 | -1.4 |
| Score | 49.5 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 36 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.5% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.6% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.1% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.0% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.9% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.1% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.1 | -1.4 |
| Score | 46.7 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 38 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.0% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.6% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 63.8% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.4% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.0% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.5% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 0.2 | -1.4 |
| Score | 48.1 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 37 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.7% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.6% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 63.6% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 21.2% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.3% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.0% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.6 | -1.4 |
| Score | 46.0 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 38 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.2% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.6% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 64.4% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 22.8% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.4% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.0 | -1.4 |
| Score | 46.8 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 41 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.1% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 66.1% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 29.4% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.3% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.4% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.1 | -1.4 |
| Score | 48.7 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 36 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.2% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.0% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 66.5% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.4% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.5% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.3% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -3.2 | -1.4 |
| Score | 47.0 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 38 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.5% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.1% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.2% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.4% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.5% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.3% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -2.8 | -1.4 |
| Score | 46.5 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 33 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.8% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.1% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.6% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.6% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.2% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -3.6 | -1.4 |
| Score | 42.4 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 37 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.5% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 68.7% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 27.6% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.6% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.9% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -4.5 | -1.4 |
| Score | 43.2 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 32 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.6% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.5% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 29.0% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.5% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.5% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -3.1 | -1.4 |
| Score | 43.5 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 39 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.1% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.1% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 71.0% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.8% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.8% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.8 | -1.4 |
| Score | 40.1 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 40 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.3% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.1% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 71.6% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 21.0% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.8% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -3.0 | -1.4 |
| Score | 37.6 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 43 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.6% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 72.7% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 26.2% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.5% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.1% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.9 | -1.4 |
| Score | 41.5 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 35 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.2% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 73.3% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 22.4% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.7% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.3% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -3.2 | -1.4 |
| Score | 37.7 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 44 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.4% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.9% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 74.5% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 26.0% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.9% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.6% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -2.7 | -1.4 |
| Score | 38.1 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 41 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.0% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.1% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 73.6% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.2% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.2% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.5% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.8 | -1.4 |
| Score | 36.6 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 34 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 13.1% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 74.6% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 21.6% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.7% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -1.1% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.5 | -1.4 |
| Score | 30.8 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 32 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 11.6% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.4% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 75.0% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 20.8% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.6% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.1% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.6 | -1.4 |
| Score | 27.2 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 39 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 12.5% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.6% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 75.8% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 22.8% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.6% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -1.1% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.6 | -1.4 |
| Score | 29.2 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 32 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 11.9% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.1% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 76.5% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 20.6% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.9% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.6% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.5 | -1.4 |
| Score | 31.1 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 28 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 12.3% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.4% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 77.2% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 22.0% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.6% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.2% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.4 | -1.4 |
| Score | 28.6 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 27 | 34 |
| 1. Business Churn | 11.9% | 11.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 77.5% | 77.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 18.8% | 18.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 70.7% | 70.7% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.4 | -1.4 |
| Score | 26.8 | 26.8 |
| Ranking | 34 | 34 |
Indicators (Click on each indicator to move to a particular graph) |
Dynamism Index
- United States
- Nebraska
Business Churn
- United States
- Nebraska
Jobs in New Companies
- United States
- Nebraska
Jobs in Incumbent Companies
- United States
- Nebraska
Labor Market Churn
- United States
- Nebraska
Labor Force Participation
- United States
- Nebraska
Change in Firms
- United States
- Nebraska
Net Migration
- United States
- Nebraska