The Dynamism Index by State
-35 – -27
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-5 – -4
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
50 – 53
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
15 – 17.5
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
40 – 44
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
1 – 1.5
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
10 – 11.6
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
0 – 10
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
| Dynamism Indicators for Illinois |
19921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014
|
2014 |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Business Churn | 16.7% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.0% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.6% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 30.8% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 68.2% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -4.4 | -7.4 |
| Score | 50.4 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 34 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.5% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.4% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 64.5% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 29.2% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 68.0% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.1 | -7.4 |
| Score | 47.2 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 37 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.6% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.7% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 64.8% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.4% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 68.0% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.6% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.3 | -7.4 |
| Score | 46.2 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 40 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.6% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.5% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 65.1% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.2% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 68.3% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.8% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -4.6 | -7.4 |
| Score | 45.5 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 40 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.9% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.4% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 65.5% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 27.4% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 68.6% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.3% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.4 | -7.4 |
| Score | 46.4 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 42 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.9% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.4% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 66.5% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 29.0% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 68.8% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.8 | -7.4 |
| Score | 46.6 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 40 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.6% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.6% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.2% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 26.0% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 68.8% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.7 | -7.4 |
| Score | 44.7 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 45 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.2% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.4% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.8% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 26.0% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 69.6% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.5 | -7.4 |
| Score | 43.0 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 41 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.8% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.2% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 68.1% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 27.4% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 69.5% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.7 | -7.4 |
| Score | 42.1 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 39 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.4% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.1% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 68.7% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 28.4% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 68.6% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.9 | -7.4 |
| Score | 40.7 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 39 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.6% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.5% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.7% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 30.6% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 67.1% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.6% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.9 | -7.4 |
| Score | 41.6 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 43 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.6% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 70.5% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 27.2% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 66.2% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.9 | -7.4 |
| Score | 39.4 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 41 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.7% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 71.0% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 26.6% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 66.2% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.0% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.7 | -7.4 |
| Score | 39.7 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 37 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.1% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.5% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 71.3% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 26.8% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 66.6% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.3% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -6.3 | -7.4 |
| Score | 41.5 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 37 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.5% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.4% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 71.6% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.4% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 67.5% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.4 | -7.4 |
| Score | 40.8 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 36 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.8% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.1% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 72.7% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 29.2% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 68.4% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -4.8 | -7.4 |
| Score | 41.2 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 34 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.1% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 73.0% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.6% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 67.8% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.7% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -4.1 | -7.4 |
| Score | 36.6 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 33 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 15.6% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 74.1% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 20.6% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 67.0% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -2.9% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -3.8 | -7.4 |
| Score | 29.6 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 34 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.3% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.9% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 74.4% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 22.0% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 66.9% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -1.4% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -4.5 | -7.4 |
| Score | 29.8 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 31 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.6% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.9% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 75.1% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 22.0% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 66.2% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.5% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.2 | -7.4 |
| Score | 30.6 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 26 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 13.9% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 75.4% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 23.8% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.9% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.9% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.7 | -7.4 |
| Score | 30.7 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 31 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.0% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.6% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 76.1% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 21.6% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.5% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -5.2 | -7.4 |
| Score | 27.9 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 30 | 31 |
| 1. Business Churn | 14.0% | 14.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 76.5% | 76.5% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 22.0% | 22.0% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 64.8% | 64.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 7. Net Migration | -7.4 | -7.4 |
| Score | 27.5 | 27.5 |
| Ranking | 31 | 31 |
Indicators (Click on each indicator to move to a particular graph) |
Dynamism Index
- United States
- Illinois
Business Churn
- United States
- Illinois
Jobs in New Companies
- United States
- Illinois
Jobs in Incumbent Companies
- United States
- Illinois
Labor Market Churn
- United States
- Illinois
Labor Force Participation
- United States
- Illinois
Change in Firms
- United States
- Illinois
Net Migration
- United States
- Illinois