The Dynamism Index by State
-35 – -27
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-5 – -4
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
50 – 53
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
15 – 17.5
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
40 – 44
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
1 – 1.5
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
10 – 11.6
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
0 – 10
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
| Dynamism Indicators for California |
19921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014
|
2014 |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Business Churn | 21.3% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.9% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 52.9% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 37.0% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 66.4% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -1.2% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -7.1 | -0.8 |
| Score | 65.6 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 11 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.6% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.2% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 55.0% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 36.2% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.9% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -1.2% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -12.6 | -0.8 |
| Score | 59.7 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 15 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.6% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.5% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 55.7% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 34.4% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.8% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.2% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -13.9 | -0.8 |
| Score | 60.0 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 15 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.3% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.4% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 56.7% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 29.6% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.5% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.8% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -12.3 | -0.8 |
| Score | 57.1 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 15 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.3% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.4% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 57.0% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 32.4% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.8% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.4% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -8.1 | -0.8 |
| Score | 60.0 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 15 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.1% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.4% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 58.5% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 34.2% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 66.3% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.4% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -4.7 | -0.8 |
| Score | 61.1 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 13 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.2% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.6% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 59.1% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 30.0% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 66.5% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.2% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -2.9 | -0.8 |
| Score | 59.5 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 15 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 19.6% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.4% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 59.2% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 32.4% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 66.4% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.3% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -2.5 | -0.8 |
| Score | 59.1 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 10 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 19.3% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.4% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 59.5% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 31.0% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 67.2% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.3% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.8 | -0.8 |
| Score | 58.2 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 9 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 19.4% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.1% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 60.2% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 32.0% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 67.1% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.2 | -0.8 |
| Score | 58.1 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 7 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 19.9% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.5% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.0% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 37.0% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 66.7% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.0% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -3.1 | -0.8 |
| Score | 61.0 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 9 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 19.9% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.3% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 63.5% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 31.2% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.9% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.4% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -2.7 | -0.8 |
| Score | 56.6 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 8 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 19.9% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.3% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 64.1% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 30.0% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.6% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.0% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -4.1 | -0.8 |
| Score | 54.8 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 10 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.2% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.4% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 64.7% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 29.6% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.5% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.4% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -6.7 | -0.8 |
| Score | 56.4 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 8 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 21.2% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.5% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 64.7% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 27.2% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.4% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -8.0 | -0.8 |
| Score | 56.2 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 11 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 19.7% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.7% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 66.0% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 32.4% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.6% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.6% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -7.3 | -0.8 |
| Score | 53.5 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 13 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 19.7% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.6% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.1% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 30.0% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.8% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.6% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -4.0 | -0.8 |
| Score | 49.5 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 10 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 19.2% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.9% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.0% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.2% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -3.2% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -2.7 | -0.8 |
| Score | 41.5 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 9 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 17.5% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.0% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.0% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 64.2% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -2.0% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -2.0 | -0.8 |
| Score | 39.0 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 10 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 17.1% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.3% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.8% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.5% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.2% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.4 | -0.8 |
| Score | 39.8 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 9 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.5% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.5% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.4% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.1% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.2 | -0.8 |
| Score | 40.5 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 9 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.4% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.8% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 22.8% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.7% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.3% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -1.3 | -0.8 |
| Score | 38.1 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 8 | 7 |
| 1. Business Churn | 17.0% | 17.0% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 70.1% | 70.1% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.8% | 24.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 62.4% | 62.4% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.8 | -0.8 |
| Score | 40.9 | 40.9 |
| Ranking | 7 | 7 |
Indicators (Click on each indicator to move to a particular graph) |
Dynamism Index
- United States
- California
Business Churn
- United States
- California
Jobs in New Companies
- United States
- California
Jobs in Incumbent Companies
- United States
- California
Labor Market Churn
- United States
- California
Labor Force Participation
- United States
- California
Change in Firms
- United States
- California
Net Migration
- United States
- California