The Dynamism Index by State
-35 – -27
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-5 – -4
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
50 – 53
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
15 – 17.5
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
40 – 44
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
1 – 1.5
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
10 – 11.6
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
0 – 10
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
| Dynamism Indicators for Arizona |
19921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014
|
2014 |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Business Churn | 22.4% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.0% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 51.1% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 39.0% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.4% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.7% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 10.1 | 6.3 |
| Score | 73.8 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 21.7% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.6% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 53.5% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 31.8% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.5% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 3.1% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 16.0 | 6.3 |
| Score | 68.6 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 4 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.6% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.1% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 54.1% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 30.2% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.5% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 4.0% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 22.2 | 6.3 |
| Score | 73.5 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.6% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.9% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 54.5% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 28.0% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 66.6% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 3.7% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 25.1 | 6.3 |
| Score | 72.6 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.3% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.6% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 55.2% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 28.2% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 66.0% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 3.2% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 17.4 | 6.3 |
| Score | 68.8 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 5 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.7% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.8% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 55.7% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 34.6% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 64.4% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 3.4% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 15.1 | 6.3 |
| Score | 72.2 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 5 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.5% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.9% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 57.2% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 32.0% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 64.9% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.4% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 13.7 | 6.3 |
| Score | 68.4 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 5 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 21.9% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.3% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 58.3% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 32.2% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.6% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.9% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 12.7 | 6.3 |
| Score | 68.9 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 4 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 21.2% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.5% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 59.0% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 32.0% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.2% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.9% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 11.7 | 6.3 |
| Score | 63.1 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 4 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.4% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.8% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 59.8% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 34.6% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.4% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.2% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Score | 65.2 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.9% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.3% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 61.9% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 39.6% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.9% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.5% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 12.6 | 6.3 |
| Score | 66.3 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 5 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.7% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.4% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 61.7% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 32.2% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.5% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.9% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 11.3 | 6.3 |
| Score | 62.3 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 5 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.5% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.2% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.0% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 30.0% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 65.0% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.6% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 15.1 | 6.3 |
| Score | 60.7 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 4 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.9% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.7% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.0% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 27.4% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 64.6% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 4.1% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 21.9 | 6.3 |
| Score | 64.0 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 5 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.2% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.8% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.3% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.2% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 64.6% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 4.9% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 22.3 | 6.3 |
| Score | 65.6 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 4 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 21.3% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.0% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 64.2% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 34.2% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.7% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 3.3% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 15.0 | 6.3 |
| Score | 62.9 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 5 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.2% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.0% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 65.2% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 30.6% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.8% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.7% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 10.2 | 6.3 |
| Score | 57.3 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.1% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.7% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.4% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.8% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.2% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -5.8% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.4 | 6.3 |
| Score | 45.1 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 7 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 19.5% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.0% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 68.4% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 28.4% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 63.1% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -3.1% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 1.8 | 6.3 |
| Score | 45.9 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 5 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 19.1% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.7% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.8% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 61.7% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -1.3% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 1.1 | 6.3 |
| Score | 41.6 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 6 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 17.4% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.6% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 27.8% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 60.6% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.7% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 5.3 | 6.3 |
| Score | 42.3 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 8 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.7% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.7% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 23.8% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 59.8% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.2% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 4.0 | 6.3 |
| Score | 37.8 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 9 | 8 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.9% | 16.9% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 69.9% | 69.9% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.6% | 25.6% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 59.8% | 59.8% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| 7. Net Migration | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Score | 39.9 | 39.9 |
| Ranking | 8 | 8 |
Indicators (Click on each indicator to move to a particular graph) |
Dynamism Index
- United States
- Arizona
Business Churn
- United States
- Arizona
Jobs in New Companies
- United States
- Arizona
Jobs in Incumbent Companies
- United States
- Arizona
Labor Market Churn
- United States
- Arizona
Labor Force Participation
- United States
- Arizona
Change in Firms
- United States
- Arizona
Net Migration
- United States
- Arizona