The Dynamism Index by State
-35 – -27
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-5 – -4
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
50 – 53
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
15 – 17.5
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
40 – 44
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
1 – 1.5
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
10 – 11.6
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
0 – 10
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
| Dynamism Indicators for Utah |
19921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014
|
2014 |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Business Churn | 20.9% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.4% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 55.6% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 33.0% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.1% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 3.5% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | 7.9 | -0.4 |
| Score | 70.0 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 8 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 20.8% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.6% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 56.5% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.8% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.2% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 4.4% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | 10.5 | -0.4 |
| Score | 67.8 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 6 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.5% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.2% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 57.7% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.8% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 73.0% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 5.4% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | 9.7 | -0.4 |
| Score | 73.3 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 4 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.4% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.4% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 58.4% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 26.2% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.0% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 4.7% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | 6.6 | -0.4 |
| Score | 72.2 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 4 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 23.1% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.0% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 58.0% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 27.0% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.5% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 5.2% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | 5.2 | -0.4 |
| Score | 72.6 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 2 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.9% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.9% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 59.5% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 31.8% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.8% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 4.3% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | 3.6 | -0.4 |
| Score | 73.2 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.9% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 4.1% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 59.2% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 33.2% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.2% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.5% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | -3.4 | -0.4 |
| Score | 72.2 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 2 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.7% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.7% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 59.0% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 30.6% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.1% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.8% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | -4.1 | -0.4 |
| Score | 69.1 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 21.5% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.4% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 59.5% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 29.6% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 72.1% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 1.7% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | -4.2 | -0.4 |
| Score | 64.2 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 21.6% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.3% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.3% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 36.4% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.9% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.9% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | -4.2 | -0.4 |
| Score | 68.0 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 2 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.0% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.8% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.0% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 36.8% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.6% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 3.2% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | -3.7 | -0.4 |
| Score | 70.8 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 2 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.5% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.8% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.8% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 33.4% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.1% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 3.4% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | -4.8 | -0.4 |
| Score | 69.0 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 2 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 21.7% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.4% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.9% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 27.6% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.1% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 3.8% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | -3.3 | -0.4 |
| Score | 63.8 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 21.8% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.7% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 61.6% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 29.8% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.6% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 4.8% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | 2.1 | -0.4 |
| Score | 68.9 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 22.8% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.8% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 61.1% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.0% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.8% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 5.2% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | 6.0 | -0.4 |
| Score | 69.5 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 21.9% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.4% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.5% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 28.2% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 71.9% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 6.0% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | 9.8 | -0.4 |
| Score | 69.4 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 21.9% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.9% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 62.8% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 29.4% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 70.9% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 0.9% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | 6.8 | -0.4 |
| Score | 62.0 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 2 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 21.6% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.5% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 64.5% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 26.4% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 69.2% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -5.0% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | 3.2 | -0.4 |
| Score | 50.0 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 2 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 19.4% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.9% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 65.7% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.4% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 68.8% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -1.4% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | 1.4 | -0.4 |
| Score | 49.8 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 18.2% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.7% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 65.7% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 25.0% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 67.8% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | -0.2% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.5 | -0.4 |
| Score | 47.1 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 17.5% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.9% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 66.6% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.4% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 67.7% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | 0.0 | -0.4 |
| Score | 48.4 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.5% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.4% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 66.3% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 24.2% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 68.2% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.5% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | 1.9 | -0.4 |
| Score | 45.7 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 3 | 2 |
| 1. Business Churn | 16.8% | 16.8% |
| 2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.7% | 2.7% |
| 3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.0% | 67.0% |
| 4. Labor Market Churn | 23.8% | 23.8% |
| 5. Labor Force Participation | 68.0% | 68.0% |
| 6. Change in Firms | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| 7. Net Migration | -0.4 | -0.4 |
| Score | 45.9 | 45.9 |
| Ranking | 2 | 2 |
Indicators (Click on each indicator to move to a particular graph) |
Dynamism Index
- United States
- Utah
Business Churn
- United States
- Utah
Jobs in New Companies
- United States
- Utah
Jobs in Incumbent Companies
- United States
- Utah
Labor Market Churn
- United States
- Utah
Labor Force Participation
- United States
- Utah
Change in Firms
- United States
- Utah
Net Migration
- United States
- Utah