The Dynamism Index by State
-35 – -27
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-27 – -19
-19 – -11
-11 – -3
-3 – 5
5 – 13
13 – 21
21 – 29
29 – 37
37–45
-5 – -4
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
-4 – -3
-3 – -2
-2 – -1
-1 – 1
1 – 2
2 – 3
3 – 4
4 – 5
5–6
50 – 53
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
53 – 56
56 – 59
59 – 62
62 – 65
65 – 68
68 – 71
71 – 74
74 – 77
77–80
15 – 17.5
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
17.5 – 20
20 – 22.5
22.5 – 25
25 – 27.5
27.5 – 30
30 – 32.5
32.5 – 35
35 – 37.5
37.5–40
40 – 44
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
44 – 48
48 – 52
52 – 56
56 – 60
60 – 64
64 – 68
68 – 72
72 – 76
76–80
1 – 1.5
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
1.5 – 2
2 – 2.5
2.5 – 3
3 – 3.5
3.5 – 4
4 – 4.5
4.5 – 5
5 – 5.5
5.5–6
10 – 11.6
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
11.6 – 13.2
13.2 – 14.8
14.8 – 16.4
16.4 – 18
18 – 19.6
19.6 – 21.2
21.2 – 22.8
22.8 – 24.4
24.4–26
0 – 10
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
10 – 20
20 – 30
30 – 40
40 – 50
50 – 60
60 – 70
70 – 80
80 – 90
90+
AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
Dynamism Indicators for Rhode Island |
19921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014
|
2014 |
---|---|---|
1. Business Churn | 16.9% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.6% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 64.9% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 28.2% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 67.6% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | -1.9% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -10.4 | -3.2 |
Score | 43.0 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 47 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 15.6% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 64.9% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 26.2% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 66.9% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | 1.7% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -9.1 | -3.2 |
Score | 42.1 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 47 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 16.6% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.7% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 65.1% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 29.0% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 65.8% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | 1.3% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -10.2 | -3.2 |
Score | 49.1 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 35 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 15.8% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.1% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 65.4% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 23.8% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 65.2% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | 1.0% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -9.4 | -3.2 |
Score | 38.6 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 49 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 16.8% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.7% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 65.5% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 26.4% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 65.4% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | 0.8% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -6.3 | -3.2 |
Score | 44.3 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 44 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 16.4% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.6% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 65.3% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 26.4% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 66.5% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | 1.2% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -5.7 | -3.2 |
Score | 44.3 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 45 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 16.4% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.1% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 65.8% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 24.8% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 66.5% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | 0.8% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -3.4 | -3.2 |
Score | 44.8 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 44 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 15.9% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.1% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 66.2% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 26.4% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 66.7% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | -0.4% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -1.0 | -3.2 |
Score | 40.7 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 44 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 14.7% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 3.4% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 66.0% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 30.2% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 66.9% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | 0.1% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | 0.8 | -3.2 |
Score | 45.9 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 28 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 14.6% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.1% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 67.4% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 26.0% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 66.4% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | 0.6% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | 2.7 | -3.2 |
Score | 39.1 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 43 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 14.9% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.2% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 68.9% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 29.2% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 66.5% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | -0.3% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | 3.8 | -3.2 |
Score | 40.6 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 44 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 14.6% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.8% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 70.2% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 25.4% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 67.2% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | 1.2% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | 1.7 | -3.2 |
Score | 40.7 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 38 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 15.5% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.7% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 70.5% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 22.2% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 66.7% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | 2.4% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -1.4 | -3.2 |
Score | 40.4 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 35 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 15.6% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.5% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 72.0% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 22.8% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 67.6% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | 0.9% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -9.5 | -3.2 |
Score | 37.6 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 46 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 16.1% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.3% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 72.4% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 26.6% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 68.4% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | 0.6% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -11.8 | -3.2 |
Score | 39.6 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 40 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 15.2% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.6% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 73.7% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 25.6% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 68.4% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | -0.7% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -9.4 | -3.2 |
Score | 36.7 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 44 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 15.1% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 2.2% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 74.3% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 25.0% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 68.0% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | -1.5% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -8.3 | -3.2 |
Score | 34.0 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 42 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 14.4% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.6% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 74.5% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 21.4% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 67.4% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | -4.9% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -5.9 | -3.2 |
Score | 25.2 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 47 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 13.2% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.7% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 75.3% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 21.2% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 67.3% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | -1.9% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -5.3 | -3.2 |
Score | 26.2 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 43 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 12.8% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.8% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 76.1% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 19.6% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 66.4% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | -1.3% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -4.8 | -3.2 |
Score | 24.6 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 45 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 12.5% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.7% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 75.8% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 23.2% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 66.0% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | 0.5% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -5.1 | -3.2 |
Score | 27.3 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 40 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 12.4% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.6% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 75.3% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 19.6% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 65.7% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | -0.6% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -3.7 | -3.2 |
Score | 24.2 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 42 | 39 |
1. Business Churn | 12.5% | 12.5% |
2. Jobs in New Companies | 1.9% | 1.9% |
3. Jobs in Incumbent Companies | 75.9% | 75.9% |
4. Labor Market Churn | 19.8% | 19.8% |
5. Labor Force Participation | 65.3% | 65.3% |
6. Change in Firms | -0.4% | -0.4% |
7. Net Migration | -3.2 | -3.2 |
Score | 25.3 | 25.3 |
Ranking | 39 | 39 |
Indicators (Click on each indicator to move to a particular graph) |
Dynamism Index
- United States
- Rhode Island
Business Churn
- United States
- Rhode Island
Jobs in New Companies
- United States
- Rhode Island
Jobs in Incumbent Companies
- United States
- Rhode Island
Labor Market Churn
- United States
- Rhode Island
Labor Force Participation
- United States
- Rhode Island
Change in Firms
- United States
- Rhode Island
Net Migration
- United States
- Rhode Island